hli logo
Image from Coce

Synthesizing evidence from narrative, text and opinion / Zoe Jordan, Rie Konno, Pei Fan Mu.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Synthesis science in healthcare series ; Book 3.Publisher: Philadelphia, [Pennsylvania] : Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, [2011]Description: 1 online resource (63 pages)ISBN:
  • 9781469800639
  • 1469800632
Subject(s): Genre/Form: DDC classification:
  • 610.721 23
Online resources: Summary: This book explores different sources of knowledge for clinical decision-making. While most health professionals have embraced the concept of evidence-informed clinical decision-making, it is true to say that clinical questions are not always answered by systematic reviews of research evidence. It is frequently the case that knowledge from different sources may be applicable (and/or available) to inform a particular procedure or intervention. In the absence of evidence derived from rigorous primary research studies, what are the options? And once this knowledge is identified, how can clinicians feel confident about it reliability and validity before utilising it in their practice?
Item type: Other List(s) this item appears in: Joanna Briggs Institute ebooks (HSE East only)
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Home library Collection Shelving location Call number URL Status Notes Date due Barcode Item holds
eBook eBook eLibrary eLibrary Joanna Briggs Institute ebooks (HSE East only) online ebook 610.721 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Link to resource Available Ebook - Login with OpenAthens username and password (HSE East only) EB0147
Total holds: 0

Includes bibliographical references.

Legal Deposit; Only available on premises controlled by the deposit library and to one user at any one time; The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK). Uk.

This book explores different sources of knowledge for clinical decision-making. While most health professionals have embraced the concept of evidence-informed clinical decision-making, it is true to say that clinical questions are not always answered by systematic reviews of research evidence. It is frequently the case that knowledge from different sources may be applicable (and/or available) to inform a particular procedure or intervention. In the absence of evidence derived from rigorous primary research studies, what are the options? And once this knowledge is identified, how can clinicians feel confident about it reliability and validity before utilising it in their practice?

Restricted: Printing from this resource is governed by The Legal Deposit Libraries (Non-Print Works) Regulations (UK) and UK copyright law currently in force. Uk.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.